The debate on spanking continues. Here are some of my comments with a lot of benefit from John Piper (as usual). See also the well done post by Martin Shields and the relevant philosophical approach of David Benatar from the Philosophy department of University of Cape Town.
Let me say first that both sides have been guilty of unwarranted argumentation: I have known children who have [not] been spanked who turned out fine. Sure. I am sure there are people who have been abused who have turned out “fine” (whatever that means). God’s grace is great and unpredictable and many kids turned out just ‘fine’ despite our imperfect way(s) of raising them. On the other hand, there may be children who have been raised ‘perfectly’ (what does that mean?) who did not turn out so well…
To get back to our issue – this question is certainly related to our theology of suffering and also of God.
Since many people on this blog (seems to me) lived and live in countries where Christians did not suffer (especially physical) pain, I can understand why suffering (it seems especially physical) is such a big problem. For some of us who lived in Communist or other countries where Christians suffered various kinds of persecution and (yes) physical pain, we learned to see its benefits too! While it can be argued that the pain was inflicted by the ‘bad guys,’ and that is mostly true, as believers in a sovereign God we also understood it as a way that God was disciplining us and working on our character. Some of the most beautiful characters I know/knew were people who were ‘chiseled’ by suffering (e.g. Richard Wurmbrand).
Contrary to what one commentator said [if I remember correctly] our God, the Loving Father, did punish His children [Israel etc] in various ways and some of them did involve PAIN (physical included).